Search for: All records

Recent work has proposed a memory property for parallel programs, called disentanglement, and showed that it is pervasive in a variety of programs, written in different languages, ranging from C/C++ to Parallel ML, and showed that it can be exploited to improve the performance of parallel functional programs. All existing work on disentanglement, however, considers the fork/join model for parallelism and does not apply to futures, the more powerful approach to parallelism. This is not surprising: fork/join parallel programs exhibit a reasonably strict dependency structure (e.g., series-parallel DAGs), which disentanglement exploits. In contrast, with futures, parallel computations become first-class values of the language, and thus can be created, and passed between functions calls or stored in memory, just like other ordinary values, resulting in complex dependency structures, especially in the presence of mutable state. For example, parallel programs with futures can have deadlocks, which is impossible with fork-join parallelism. In this paper, we are interested in the theoretical question of whether disentanglement may be extended beyond fork/join parallelism, and specifically to futures. We consider a functional language with futures, Input/Output (I/O), and mutable state (references) and show that a broad range of programs written in this language are disentangled. We start by formalizing disentanglement for futures and proving that purely functional programs written in this language are disentangled. We then generalize this result in three directions. First, we consider state (effects) and prove that stateful programs are disentangled if they are race free. Second, we show that race freedom is sufficient but not a necessary condition and non-deterministic programs, e.g. those that use atomic read-modify-operations and some non-deterministic combinators, may also be disentangled. Third, we prove that disentangled task-parallel programs written with futures are free of deadlocks, which arise due to interactions between state and the rich dependencies that can be expressed with futures. Taken together, these results show that disentanglement generalizes to parallel programs with futures and, thus, the benefits of disentanglement may go well beyond fork-join parallelism. 

Although functional programming languages simplify writing safe parallel programs by helping programmers to avoid data races, they have traditionally delivered poor performance. Recent work improved performance by using a hierarchical memory architecture that allows processors to allocate and reclaim memory independently without any synchronization, solving thus the key performance challenge afflicting functional programs. The approach, however, restricts mutation, or memory effects, so as to ensure "disentanglement", a low-level memory property that guarantees independence between different heaps in the hierarchy. This paper proposes techniques for supporting entanglement and for allowing functional programs to use mutation at will. Our techniques manage entanglement by distinguishing between disentangled and entangled objects and shielding disentangled objects from the cost of entanglement management. We present a semantics that formalizes entanglement as a property at the granularity of memory objects, and define several cost metrics to reason about and bound the time and space cost of entanglement. We present an implementation of the techniques by extending the MPL compiler for Parallel ML. The extended compiler supports all features of the Parallel ML language, including unrestricted effects. Our experiments using a variety of benchmarks show that MPL incurs a small time and space overhead compared to sequential runs, scales well, and is competitive with languages such as C++, Go, Java, OCaml. These results show that our techniques can marry the safety benefits of functional programming with performance. 

Recent research on parallel functional programming has culminated in a provably efficient (in work and space) parallel memory manager, which has been incorporated into the MPL (MaPLe) compiler for Parallel ML and shown to deliver practical efficiency and scalability. The memory manager exploits a property of parallel programs called disentanglement, which restricts computations from accessing concurrently allocated objects. Disentanglement is closely related to race-freedom, but subtly differs from it. Unlike race-freedom, however, no known techniques exists for ensuring disentanglement, leaving the task entirely to the programmer. This is a challenging task, because it requires reasoning about low-level memory operations (e.g., allocations and accesses), which is especially difficult in functional languages. In this paper, we present techniques for detecting entanglement dynamically, while the program is running. We first present a dynamic semantics for a functional language with references that checks for entanglement by consulting parallel and sequential dependency relations in the program. Notably, the semantics requires checks for mutable objects only. We prove the soundness of the dynamic semantics and present several techniques for realizing it efficiently, in particular by pruning away a large number of entanglement checks. We also provide bounds on the work and space of our techniques. We show that the entanglement detection techniques are practical by implementing them in the MPL compiler for Parallel ML. Considering a variety of benchmarks, we present an evaluation and measure time and space overheads of less than 5% on average with up to 72 cores. These results show that entanglement detection has negligible cost and can therefore remain deployed with little or no impact on efficiency, scalability, and space. 

Because of its many desirable properties, such as its ability to control effects and thus potentially disastrous race conditions, functional programming offers a viable approach to programming modern multicore computers. Over the past decade several parallel functional languages, typically based on dialects of ML and Haskell, have been developed. These languages, however, have traditionally underperformed procedural languages (such as C and Java). The primary reason for this is their hunger for memory, which only grows with parallelism, causing traditional memory management techniques to buckle under increased demand for memory. Recent work opened a new angle of attack on this problem by identifying a memory property of determinacy-race-free parallel programs, called disentanglement, which limits the knowledge of concurrent computations about each other’s memory allocations. The work has showed some promise in delivering good time scalability. In this paper, we present provably space-efficient automatic memory management techniques for determinacy-race-free functional parallel programs, allowing both pure and imperative programs where memory may be destructively updated. We prove that for a program with sequential live memory of R * , any P -processor garbage-collected parallel run requires at most O ( R * · P ) memory. We also prove a work bound of O ( W + R * P ) for P -processor executions, accounting also for the cost of garbage collection. To achieve these results, we integrate thread scheduling with memory management. The idea is to coordinate memory allocation and garbage collection with thread scheduling decisions so that each processor can allocate memory without synchronization and independently collect a portion of memory by consulting a collection policy, which we formulate. The collection policy is fully distributed and does not require communicating with other processors. We show that the approach is practical by implementing it as an extension to the MPL compiler for Parallel ML. Our experimental results confirm our theoretical bounds and show that the techniques perform and scale well.